YOUR BUSINESS AUTHORITY

Springfield, MO

Log in Subscribe

Unemployment repayment halt stalled by amendment in Jeff City

Posted online

Questions of political opportunism circulated the Missouri Senate as an overwhelmingly popular effort to halt the repayment of overpaid unemployment benefits was derailed by a last-minute substitute.

The legislation, House Bill 1083, would require the Department of Labor to stop charging Missourians who were overpaid unemployment benefits during the pandemic. The bill already had passed the House of Representatives and was well on its way to passing with bipartisan support in the Senate on Monday evening.

Then Sen. Mike Bernskoetter, R-Jefferson City, amended the bill to include a provision that would permanently shorten the length of time Missouri residents are eligible to receive unemployment benefits. Under the provision, Missouri would offer a shorter eligibility window — between 12 and 20 weeks, depending on the health of the economy — than any other state in the nation.

“We took what I would consider an easy bill and injected a really contentious topic into it,” said Sen. John Rizzo, D-Independence, who proposed another amendment to take out the provision.

Senators on both sides of the issue emphasized the importance of the original legislation in helping their constituents.

Opponents argued that this bill was not the right forum to have the debate — that threatening the prospects of unambiguously important legislation with a contentious addition willfully undermined the efforts.

“We’re having two separate conversations. Whether unemployment benefits should be 20 weeks, 40 weeks, eight weeks, that’s a conversation for a different day,” said Sen. Steven Roberts, D-St. Louis. “Right now, our constituents are struggling. We need to put this amendment off, and we need to focus on the original intention.”

But other senators argued that the substitute was an extension of the bill’s intent and was vitally important.

“Our economy cannot sustain what we’re doing today,” said Sen. Mike Moon, R-Ash Grove.

Moon and other proponents argued that unemployment benefits are creating a disincentive for people to return to work and that the payments are stimulating inflation. While there has been discussion about how the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act benefit increases and stimulus money will prompt inflation, unemployment benefits funded by the state are not traditionally understood by economists to have a direct correlation with inflation.

Some senators said that proponents were trying to levy the high investment in the legislation to move a more difficult issue forward.

“To conflate these two issues,” said Sen. Lauren Arthur, D-Kansas City, “it’s enough to make someone cynical.”

Opponents made it clear they were not willing to give in on the unemployment eligibility issue and would allow the passage of the bill to hinge on its removal.

“If we take this out ...” said Sen. Greg Razer, D-Kansas City.

“... Great bill,” said Arthur, completing the thought. “Best bill we’ll pass all year. It’ll fly through.”

No compromise was reached on the substitute and responding amendment, and the bill was tabled.

Comments

No comments on this story |
Please log in to add your comment
Editors' Pick
Wilson’s Creek visitor center reopens

Delays push $4.5M renovation project into 2021.

Most Read
SBJ.net Poll
Are you planning to travel this summer?

This poll is not a scientific sampling. It offers a snapshot of what readers are thinking.

View results