The Missouri House's refusal to fund voter-approved Medicaid expansion reminds me of a long-used state legislative tactic of kicking the can down the road.
The federal Medicaid program requires a state to provide matching funds to be eligible for the much larger chunk of federal monies. Yet for more years than I can remember, the annual budget approved by Missouri's legislature often failed to fully fund the estimated Medicaid funding requirement for the budget year.
Instead, the General Assembly simply kicked the can into the subsequent calendar year for lawmakers to pass a "supplemental" budget to cover the Medicaid shortfall. Because the supplemental budget gets less news coverage, it generates less attention to the growing Medicaid budget, making the legislature's larger "welfare" budget less obvious.
Medicaid, part of President Lyndon Johnson's 1965 "Great Society" agenda, provides health care coverage for lower income residents if states kick in a smaller match. It effectively makes Medicaid a joint federal-state partnership. In 2014, under the Affordable Care Act of the Obama administration, eligibility was expanded to adults with incomes effectively up to 138% of the federal poverty level.
But, Missouri's Republican legislature refused to appropriate the required matching state funds for the expanded coverage.
That led to the 2020 state constitutional amendment approved by Missouri voters that those who meet the new federal Medicaid qualifications shall receive coverage. The amendment also requires the Social Services Department to take all actions necessary to implement Medicaid expansion and submit a plan to the feds. In fact, as I write this column, the Social Services Department is preparing plans for implementation.
That language strikes me as establishing a legal entitlement under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. That equal protection amendment prohibits a state from denying to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Various court decisions have held the amendment requires that when a right or service is established by law, no state can deny those services to those who meet the qualifications.
Missouri has a long history with this issue. In 1935, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court held the state could not deny admission to state law school to a Black student.
Beginning in 1980, the 14th Amendment was cited in court orders requiring desegregation of Missouri schools, regardless of the costs.
But for the Medicaid expansion requirement, the House-passed version of the budget for the next budget year that begins July 1 provides not one penny of the state money that would be required for Medicaid expansion.
A fascinating aspect is that Medicaid expansion might not cost the state a penny.
The American Rescue Plan Act approved by Congress this year lowers how much a state must contribute to match existing Medicaid coverage if the state implements Medicaid expansion. The private Missouri Budget Project estimates that law could lower how much Missouri must contribute for existing Medicaid coverage by more than $1 billion over a two-year period.
That saving is far higher than the estimated state cost for Medicaid expansion of about $130 million per year. In other words, if the Missouri Budget Project is correct, the state could enjoy a huge profit from the feds by implementing Medicaid expansion.
On the other side, some Republican legislators have argued rejecting the expanded federal support is an act of financial discipline for the growing debt of the federal government. One issue would be whether the 14th Amendment requires the state to fund Medicaid expansion. Another issue could be whether such a requirement violates a state constitutional prohibition on a ballot initiative from appropriating funds.
But if the legislature does not take advantage of those extra funds, it likely kicks the can down the road to the courts.
Phill Brooks has been a statehouse reporter since 1970, making him the dean of the Missouri statehouse press corps. He is director of Missouri Digital News and an emeritus faculty member of the Missouri School of Journalism.
Cuban cuisine arrived on C-Street with the opening of La Habana Vieja; independent brokerage Gateway Real Estate opened its first office; and a veteran of the restaurant industry invested in her first food truck.
Barak Hill gives advice based on what he learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and how it affected his business. He says we should all have a backup plan ready to use.
Sandy Higgins, owner of the Crackerjack Shack, recommends the book "The E-Myth Mastery" by Michael E Gerber. She says it changed the course of how she runs her business.
Aaron York describes the work culture he tries to foster at Donco3 and why he attributes to it a part of Donco3's success. Rachel York is a co-owner of Donco3 and Aaron is the General Superintendent.
Hollie Elliott, executive director of the Dallas County Economic Development Group, explains how local schools factor into business decisions and affect a local community.
Rachel Barks, owner of Artistree Pottery, says an important lesson she learned was not to over-expand and to do her research before hand. She gives examples from her experience as a startup business owner.
Jim and Debbie Meinsen own TCI Graphics, and are now celebrating 50 years of business. Jim Meinsen takes some time to explain his philosophy on debt, and how to stay out of it.
Caleb Scott, owner and coach of Queen City Insane Asylum semi-professional football, says the early grind was hard, but it was worth it. The team is in their second season carrying a national ranking of number 2 in the NFA IDFL.
Barak Hill, local musician and entrepreneur, tells about his switch to livestreaming in 2020. He says it was a necessary move, but also not an easy one.
Jessica Burkland, a SCORE mentor and an instructor at the MSU Department of Management, gives us a rundown of the non-profit organization SCORE. SCORE stands for Service Corps of Retired Executives and offers free consultation and advice to business owners.
Hollie Elliott, the executive director of the Dallas County Economic Development Group, discusses some of the ways helping small town businesses is different than in larger cities. The Dallas County Economic Development Group is a 501(c)(3) non-profit aimed at helping local existing and new businesses in the county.