It is no secret that our daily lives have become increasingly digitized over the past few decades. In today’s world, we interact and communicate with one another instantly through the click of a button. Customers and clients are increasingly finding service providers through searches on the web, reviewing multiple websites until they find the best fit for their specific needs.
One result of this digital environment has been the dramatic rise in lawsuits against businesses alleging that their websites are not accessible to the visually or audibly impaired in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In 2016, 262 of these cases were filed nationwide. In 2019, that number rose to 2,235, nearly nine times as many from three years prior.
These suits are usually filed by out-of-state firms focusing exclusively on this issue, and the evidence indicates that these claims will only increase into the future. Retail is the industry most often targeted by these claims, followed closely by food service, entertainment and hospitality.
Specifically, the ADA requires “places of public accommodation” to make their goods and services readily available to people with disabilities. This might require reasonable modifications in policies, practices or procedures, providing access to auxiliary aids and services to ensure effective communication with the disabled or removing communication barriers to disabled individuals. Discrimination occurs under the ADA when a disabled individual is denied the opportunity to participate in programs or services or when they are provided with separate, but unequal, goods or services.
The question becomes: Is a website a place of public accommodation subject to the ADA? At first glance, the ADA does not appear to apply to websites and other electronic applications. After all, the internet as we know it today did not exist when the ADA was passed in 1990. As a result, none of the accessibility guidelines of the ADA explicitly mention websites operated by public accommodations. However, the broad language of the ADA and multiple indications from the U.S. Department of Justice, Congress and the courts over the past several years have brought such websites into the discussion.
Unfortunately, while this issue has gained greater attention in recent years, Congress and the courts have failed to adequately clarify the scope of the ADA in terms of website accessibility compliance for companies. Last year, a bill was finally introduced in the House of Representatives that might have given clarity to this issue. While the Online Accessibility Act did not progress past its introduction, it is likely to be addressed again soon.
Additionally, since the mid-1990s, courts across the nation have grappled with the issue of whether the ADA is limited solely to physical spaces and whether a company’s website requires a connection to a physical location to be subject to the ADA’s protections.
Unfortunately, courts have reached widely varying conclusions in different parts of the country, leaving uncertainty as to the universal answer to the question. It seems improbable that the U.S. Supreme Court will resolve the split in the existing court decisions anytime soon, but clarity is badly needed to ensure businesses know how to react.
So, how can businesses avoid becoming the next target of these lawsuits without solid guidance from the legal system? Be proactive. Create and implement a website accessibility policy for your business. Such a policy should provide guidelines for training employees in the ADA’s requirements, soliciting feedback from website users, providing a platform for complaints and requests for accommodations, outlining procedures for quickly responding to accessibility issues, and providing alternative ways to access the information on your website, such as video subtitles. It also is highly prudent to hire a web designer or digital marketing team to perform a periodic review and audit of your website and perform updates to ensure it is compatible with existing accessibility laws. Remember: The cost of ensuring, in advance, that your website is ADA accessible is cheaper than a lawsuit.
Andy Peebles is an estate planning and business attorney with the law firm of Carnahan, Evans, Cantwell & Brown PC. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Demand is ramping up as COVID restrictions relent.
This poll is not a scientific sampling. It offers a snapshot of what readers are thinking.
Jessica Burkland, a Missouri State University business instructor in the Department of Management, says now is a great time for innovators to start a small business for several reasons. Burkland, who owns Activate Consulting & Training and volunteers as a small business mentor for SCORE of Southwest Missouri, shares three things entrepreneurs should know.
Local Musician Barak Hill talks about how he started writing music and earning money from his skills. He says his first motivation to start making money was to get music to pay for itself.
Heather Kite, owner of startup business Rooted Deep Farms, talks about tough times during the winter of 2020-2021. She says determination was a necessary component that kept her going.
Jeramey and Julia Henson, co-owners of HM Dentworks Academy, discuss the importance of family in work-life balance. They say you can’t make up for the major life events. HM Dentworks Academy is also co-owned by Chris McWhirter.
Rachel Barks, owner of Artistry Pottery, talks about her struggle with PXE, or Pseudoxanthoma elasticum, a disease that affects the eyes. She says that despite her struggle, she is ultimately thankful.
Jessica Burkland, a Missouri State University business instructor in the Department of Management, talks about small business start-up trends in a post-pandemic year. Burkland, who owns Activate Consulting & Training and volunteers as a small business mentor for SCORE of Southwest Missouri, says startups that offer new services and products to help people work from home or that enhance mental health could find greater success.
Jim and Debbie Meinsen, co-owners of TCI Graphics, say the past year has been one of the toughest they have faced. Now in the company's 50th year, the couple says they learned a few things in 2020.
Charlie Rosenbury, president of Self-Interactive, calls on his experience in programming to illustrate lessons he has learned running a business and life in general. Springfield Business Journal's 90 Ideas is presented by Great Southern Bank.
Darline Mabins talks with SBJ’s Christine Temple about growing up after a tragic accident took the lives of her mother and older brother. Mabins is now the regional branch sales manager for Arvest Bank. No Ceiling is an SBJ podcast, going in depth with local women, sharing their journey to the top of their professions.
Caleb Scott, owner, coach and player for Queen City Insane Asylum semi-professional football team, talks about the ways that the team works to support each other on and off the field. Scott says you can’t force people to become leaders, they have to come naturally.