YOUR BUSINESS AUTHORITY
Springfield, MO
Springfield City Council held a public hearing on a plan to seek replacement of a three-quarter-cent city sales tax at its meeting July 22 and received input from a dozen community members who implored council to include housing in the ballot language.
Instead of adding the word “housing” to the measure that, if approved, would go before voters in November, council members stuck with language recommended by its Citizens’ Commission on Community Investment.
Had the addition been approved, the measure’s language would have highlighted housing initiatives as an option for use of the funding.
The CCCI was charged with coming up with a plan for whether and how to replace a three-quarter-cent tax that has been used since its original passage in 2009 to support the city’s Police and Fire Pension Fund and now would be able to fund additional initiatives.
The present tax, which provides some $45 million in annual funding, sunsets on March 31, 2025.
Council is scheduled to vote on the tax on Aug. 5.
The CCCI recommendation is for voters to be asked in the Nov. 5 general election to pass a new three-quarter-cent tax, with one-quarter of a cent to continue to go toward the pension fund – now 91% funded – along with other safety initiatives, including police officer and firefighter pay. The other two-quarters of a cent would fund projects that are consistent with the city’s Forward SGF comprehensive plan, to include capital improvements, community and neighborhood initiatives, and park projects.
The one-quarter-cent tax would never sunset, and the other two-quarters would be assessed for a decade.
Speakers who asked for housing to be included in the funding plan were members of Springfield Tenants Unite, a tenants’ rights organization that frequently advocates for housing initiatives in front of council, and other local housing advocates. They contended that housing is a key priority of Forward SGF and is an area of great need in the community.
Among the other community members asking for housing to be included in the measure were Aaron Schekorra, executive director of The GLO Center, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization; Michelle Garand, vice president for affordable housing and homeless prevention for Community Partnership of the Ozarks Inc.; David Derossett, a sociologist and a leader of the Springfield-Ozarks Chapter of Missouri Jobs with Justice; Isabelle Jimenez Walker, commissioner on the city’s Public Housing Authority Board; and Katie Anderson, executive director of the Housing Authority of Springfield.
Councilmember Brandon Jenson offered a compromise in the form of an amendment.
Though the speakers were united in asking for housing to be included in ballot language, Jenson’s amendment suggestion would not have changed the ballot language. Rather, it would have offered definitional clarity in the accompanying ordinance, clearly outlining the eligibility of funding for housing and code enforcement activities.
Jenson pointed out that housing and enhanced code enforcement are both eligible activities for funding under the ballot language as it is written.
“I do think it’s important to note that this amendment offers definitional clarity only and does not make any modifications to the ballot language itself or to the list of evaluation criteria, out of respect for the work that the Citizens’ Commission on Community Investment did and the official report and set of recommendations that they provided to us,” Jenson said.
Similar definitional language – about public safety – was already added by council in its preparation to vote on the ordinance, Jenson said.
Jenson’s amendment would have added this sentence: “For the purposes of this tax, the term ‘community and neighborhood initiatives’ shall be construed to include but not be limited to housing and code enforcement.”
The amendment, which was seconded by Councilmember Monica Horton, failed by a 5-4 vote. Jenson, Horton, Craig Hosmer and Heather Hardinger voted in favor.
Prior to the vote, Hosmer expressed his strong support of the amendment.
“When we look at the poor neighborhoods in this city, we have high instances of fires, we have high instances of crime and we have low homeownership,” he said. “We talk about quality of place. Good neighborhoods, good housing stock, people living in housing that is habitable and safe – that is quality of place.”
Hosmer said he has been on council for 12 years, and in that time, council has done a lot of talking about housing.
“If we want to deal with these chronic problems, this is what we have to do: We have to put our money where our priorities are,” he said.
Mayor Pro Tem Matthew Simpson spoke against the inclusion of a direct reference to housing in the ordinance, instead deferring to the language provided by unanimous consensus of the CCCI. He said Forward SGF is a document that reflects community priorities, and it includes housing.
“I think it was very wise of the Citizens’ Commission – I think that’s reflected in the unanimous consensus – to reference Forward SGF as the guiding point for the citizen recommendations on what projects and investments that we should put money in with this half-cent moving forward,” Simpson said.
In their arguments prior to the vote for including housing in the measure, members of Springfield Tenants Unite reiterated that securing votes from the roughly 60% of the community that rents instead of owns housing will be important.
“We are a city of renters; we are a city of poor and working-class people,” said Alice Barber, a leader of STUN. “We, the poor and working-class renters in Springfield, will be the ones paying the tax. So, it’s up to you to show us that it’s worth it.”
Other action items
The city of Springfield is asking voters to approve a three-quarter-cent sales tax in the Nov. 5 general election.
Downtown business owners pen letter critical of Route 66 Festival
Construction to start this month on restaurant at historic mill site
Updated: Jason Gage to resign as city manager
Former FTX Digital Markets exec announces prison stint on LinkedIn
Apartments planned at century-old building in downtown Springfield