Earlier this month, Springfield City Council took up a proposed ordinance that would allow law enforcement officials to pull over drivers for “careless and distracted driving.”
Regardless of whether the city ordinance is viable – council is expected to vote May 21 – responsible drivers should take a moment to weigh their priorities.
We’ve probably all, at one point or another, been guilty of texting while driving. At the very least, we’ve all likely engaged in so-called distracted driving.
It’s tough to admit. But it’s an important part of awareness to acknowledge that, as individuals and as a society, we’ve been part of something so incredibly deleterious.
In 2015 and 2016, the most recent years available, around 3,500 people were killed via crashes involving distracted drivers, according to data by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
As for injuries, the NHTSA reports over 390,000 people are hurt in distracted driving crashes each year.
Economic harm also is a factor. NHTSA data from 2010 show crashes involving distracted driving caused $40 billion in economic harm, including property damages, lawsuits, loss of productivity and health care expenses.
The NHTSA defines distracted driving as “anything that takes your attention away from the task of safe driving.” That may include eating and drinking while at the wheel, talking to others in the car or attempting to control the stereo, entertainment or navigation systems. But, according to the NHTSA, texting is the worst offender.
“Sending or reading a text takes your eyes off the road for five seconds. At 55 mph, that’s like driving the length of an entire football field with your eyes closed,” according to the NHTSA.
Put up against those daunting statistics, the data and logic are pretty clear on this one.
So, why do people continue to text while driving?
For many, it’s because it’s never caused a problem. The NHTSA data show fatalities in crashes caused by distracted drivers represented 9.2 percent of total traffic deaths in 2016.
It’s created the worst kind of confirmation bias. If I’m only 9 percent likely to die because of distracted driving – or riding with someone who is engaging in the activity – that’s less than a 1 in 10 chance, right?
Technically, yes, when looking at the data. But that can be misleading.
Research in 2015 by Tennessee Technological University assistant professor Steven Seiler hypothesized watching others drive while distracted creates a compounding effect.
“Sociologically, riding with others who engage in such behaviors without consequence contributes to a culture of multitasking while driving,” Seiler wrote in the study called, “Hand on the Wheel, Mind on the Mobile.”
Undoubtedly, we’ve been conditioned to pick up our phone when it rings or buzzes. It’s a bit Pavlovian, to be sure.
But the logical interpretation of the data says cars and phones don’t mix.
If it’s really an emergency, why not pull over at a gas station or parking lot to answer the message? If you have a passenger, ask them to text for you. Hands-free options also are available, though even those can be distracting.
You’ll survive if you don’t answer a text right away. You might not if you pick up the phone in the car.
Back to the city’s proposed ordinance, Councilman Craig Hosmer arguably had the most important point on the subject.
“This [ordinance] gives us the ability to direct people, to inform people, on what we mean when we say, ‘Focus your attention on the road in front of you, where your focus should be,’” he said at the May 7 council meeting.
Whether council passes the ordinance or not, responsible drivers should pledge not to text and drive. Let’s agree to nip this in the bud now before it spreads further to future generations.
SBJ Web Producer Geoff Pickle can be reached at email@example.com.
Ozarks Elder Law LLC closed on its acquisition of RTR Attorneys in Marshfield; Nashville-style fried chicken and catfish restaurant Hot Cluckers got its start; and the first Geico insurance office in the Queen City opened.
“We are trying to change systems here, not just people, so it takes committed consistency,” says Keisha Mabry, who is an author, speaker, and social entrepreneur. Microaggressions are verbal or …
“A lot of the things we have were family heirlooms,” says Sean Brownfield, owner of Dapper and The Hepburn. Brownfield says curating the furniture and decor for both Dapper and The Hepburn was …
“This business in this location with us running it, was never able to generate the kind of income that I could’ve said, ‘okay Gabe, okay Kathy, here is a good health plan that you guys …
Kirsten Miller, Compliance Manager at Uber, says one of her most interesting tasks was launching a new market in Hobart, Australia. They had no data for the market and had to rely on information …
“If it doesn’t play on a mobile phone, you’re dead, period. Everything else is ancient history,” says Scott Opfer, President of Opfer Communications. Opfer says your business needs to be able …
“Growth for growth’s sake is a very dangerous path to get on. It really only leads to chaos, less profitability, less structure,” says Mickey Moore, CEO of Tomo Drug Testing. Moore says he …
“I like Jungian philosophy and I like existentialism, so by reading about that, it helps give me purpose in what I do, and keeps me motivated,” says Linda Saturno, Executive Director of the Child …
“Time management’s a constant challenge, especially [for] entrepreneurial people, because you tend to be workaholics to some degree, and you’re always trying to grow and you’re always trying …
“We do have a progressive approach to building a company. We are a flat organization and try to give everyone equal weight as far as business decisions are concerned,” says Tyler Drenon, Director …
Shawn Usery, Chief Medical Officer at Cox Medical Center Branson, says learning to delegate and embracing other professionals is the way to ensure patients receive the best care. “Having everybody …