Last edited 3:47 p.m., April 25, 2018
Editor’s note: Branson resident Michael Hynes examined the tax increment financing proposal for Branson Adventures and attended the public discussion with city officials. Here’s a summary of his analysis after last night’s 5-1 vote to deny the development application.
The 365-page tax increment financing application, which cost over $300,000 to produce, may have been impressive to the consultants who created it, but it appears to have been overkill and beyond what the average person could digest.
I am sure it was to developer David Cushman’s dismay that the report was used as fodder by all who opposed the TIF for his Branson Adventures proposal. The report contained about 100 pages of complex financial data, most of which was in print too small to read.
“Was the data correct?”
“Was it too optimistic?”
“Was it too pessimistic?”
Those were questions asked but never answered by the city. Depending on who was addressing the Branson Board of Aldermen, everyone seemed able to quote from the report and use it to oppose the formation of the TIF.
Why stop the TIF?
There were many reasons given why Branson does not need the proposed TIF. They could be narrowed down to two:
1. “I don’t want my tax money given to someone, so they can start a new business and get rich.” The statements that Cushman was asking for “the taxpayer’s money” and “city of Branson funds” to build his project were never disputed. Someone from the city should have addressed this claim.
2. The strong belief held by the objectors was that the business activities planned within the TIF would cannibalize income from existing businesses.
Taxpayer fact and fiction
As claimed by the objectors of the new TIF in Branson, this TIF is just helping the rich get richer. The phrases “using taxpayers’ money” or “city funds” to help Cushman has become the cry of the opposition to the TIF.
I was surprised the TIF application and approval process was allowed to turn into a public relations nightmare for Cushman.
Back in 1952, when the TIF concept was first created in California, the public did not know much about it or how it worked. The use of a TIF quickly spread across America, with Missouri being a leader in TIF formation. However, over the years, the use of a TIF to help fund development of blighted areas has led to much abuse.
For Branson Adventures, the city had spent almost a year and paid about $10,000 for experts to study the TIF proposal. The conclusion was that the TIF would be good for the citizens and businesses in Branson. The special TIF study committee appointed by the city also recommended that the TIF project be allowed to progress.
It was obvious that the average person did not understand how “the use of taxes raised within the TIF” really works. The TIF allows a governing body, which is set up to manage it, to establish and collect “sales or use taxes” from the people who do business only within the TIF.
Factually, the TIF would never receive any “tax money” or “funds from the city of Branson.” This fact was never addressed by any city staff or the aldermen.
Concerns of cannibalizing sales
On cannibalizing tourists and local customers from existing Branson businesses, the strongest objections came from motel and hotel owners. There may be roughly 155 motels and hotels in Branson.
The lodging facilities to be built in the TIF are for high-end customers willing to pay up to $300 per night. It does not seem logical that tourists, who are now paying an average of $50 per night, would be cannibalized by the hotel planned to be built in the TIF.
The TIF consultants estimate that as many as 600,000 new tourists would come to Branson as a result to the activities planned within the TIF and new marketing dollars being spent by the TIF. Would not many of these new tourists prefer lower cost hotel/motel rooms? Is the potential loss of business by existing hotels/motels in Branson the correct or legal grounds to stop the TIF?
The impact the TIF might have on existing Branson restaurants, the zip lines and other attractions also was voiced. Like opposition to many economic expansion projects, “Not in my back yard” thinking prevailed at the two public hearings.
Emotional, rather than business logic, seems to have prevailed.
Michael Hynes can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Locals are affected by the longest shutdown in U.S. history.
“We’re selling three things really — we’re selling quality beer, we’re selling a hip atmosphere to consume that beer within the neighborhood, and finally and maybe even most importantly, …
“We are trying to change systems here, not just people, so it takes committed consistency,” says Keisha Mabry, who is an author, speaker, and social entrepreneur. Microaggressions are verbal or …
“A lot of the things we have were family heirlooms,” says Sean Brownfield, owner of Dapper and The Hepburn. Brownfield says curating the furniture and decor for both Dapper and The Hepburn was …
“This business in this location with us running it, was never able to generate the kind of income that I could’ve said, ‘okay Gabe, okay Kathy, here is a good health plan that you guys …
Kirsten Miller, Compliance Manager at Uber, says one of her most interesting tasks was launching a new market in Hobart, Australia. They had no data for the market and had to rely on information …
“If it doesn’t play on a mobile phone, you’re dead, period. Everything else is ancient history,” says Scott Opfer, President of Opfer Communications. Opfer says your business needs to be able …
“Growth for growth’s sake is a very dangerous path to get on. It really only leads to chaos, less profitability, less structure,” says Mickey Moore, CEO of Tomo Drug Testing. Moore says he …
“I like Jungian philosophy and I like existentialism, so by reading about that, it helps give me purpose in what I do, and keeps me motivated,” says Linda Saturno, Executive Director of the Child …
“Time management’s a constant challenge, especially [for] entrepreneurial people, because you tend to be workaholics to some degree, and you’re always trying to grow and you’re always trying …
“We do have a progressive approach to building a company. We are a flat organization and try to give everyone equal weight as far as business decisions are concerned,” says Tyler Drenon, Director …